3rd
September
2008
Posted by
James Taylor
An interesting article on the role of the business analyst in creating a common vision caught my eye this morning. The article focused on creating a common vision but it made me think about maintaining and developing that common vision over time, particularly of the complex logic in a system. Procedural code does not lend [...]
Read more
posted by James Taylor in Business Rules, Decision Management |
27th
August
2008
Posted by
James Taylor
A reader had an interesting question this week. As a comment to Using decision management to deliver intelligent business performance he asked “What makes a company ready?”. I suspect my closing line “The products are, mostly, ready. Whether companies are is another question…” prompted this.
So, what makes a company ready for enterprise decision management - [...]
Read more
posted by James Taylor in Decision Management, Reader Questions |
25th
August
2008
Posted by
James Taylor
A student of Information Systems for Business Performance at University College Cork, Ireland is investigating how SOA can influence the IT capability of a firm and to what extent this strategy can become a major initiative for changing the underlying business approach of an organization. I offered to post the survey which should take no longer [...]
Read more
posted by James Taylor in SOA |
15th
August
2008
Posted by
James Taylor
Chris Berg wrote a nice piece on Pressure Points that seemed like it was worth highlighting. Chris outlines some great reasons for using business rules and he seems to Believe in business rules (as I do).
Read more
posted by James Taylor in Business Agility, Business Rules |
12th
August
2008
Posted by
James Taylor
I saw this piece on DSL and MDE, necessary assets for Model-Driven approaches and it made me think about DSLs. First, here’s the definition of a DSL from the article
DSL is a programming language or executable specification language that offers, through appropriate notations and abstractions, expressive power focused on, and usually restricted to, a particular [...]
Read more
posted by James Taylor in Business Agility, Business Rules |
5th
August
2008
Posted by
James Taylor
Steve Cranford of PwC wrote an interesting piece called Bringing Order to Chaos (brought to my attention by Alan over at Tibco) that made me think. Steve’s focus is on the next software suite for enterprises (something he calls an Intelligent Business Performance Platform) consisting of business intelligence, business process and business rules. Reading this [...]
Read more
posted by James Taylor in Business Intelligence, Business Process Management, Composite Applications, Decision Management, SOA |
4th
August
2008
Posted by
James Taylor
I got an interesting series of questions from a reader that seemed to me to justify a longish post. The initial question was quite harmless looking:
Can you give a clue as to what software engineering approach you use/recommend for EDM, but especially business rules that non-IT staff can alter safely?
But the whole thing got more [...]
Read more
posted by James Taylor in Business Rules, Composite Applications, Decision Management, Reader Questions |
1st
August
2008
Posted by
James Taylor
Earlier this week I posted Application Development 2.0 in which I addressed what I see as some of the issues with current development practices and tried to explain why I think a declarative, business rules approach is essential. This (and some blog posts around the blogosphere) made me think about the mismatch I see when [...]
Read more
posted by James Taylor in Business Rules |
30th
July
2008
Posted by
James Taylor
Ann All had a post on Agile development brings IT, business together that had the great phrase “application development 2.0″. In the article she mentioned some very worthy objectives for this 2.0 version of application development. Here they are, paraphrased slightly.
Encourage close collaboration between developers and end users
Involve users in quality assurance processes
Don’t use traditional [...]
Read more
posted by James Taylor in Business Agility, Business Rules |
23rd
June
2008
Posted by
James Taylor
There was more discussion in the blogosphere about the James McGovern COBOL is Evil post - COBOL is not evil, but COBOL programmers are. Now I already posted a response to James’ post (Why don’t you replace COBOL with something useful - not Java) but this new post made me think. I should say that [...]
Read more
posted by James Taylor in Business Agility, Business Rules, Legacy Modernization |