<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: COBOL Lives! In the business rules space at least</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartenoughsystems.com/wp/2008/02/20/cobol-lives-in-the-business-rules-space-at-least/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartenoughsystems.com/wp/2008/02/20/cobol-lives-in-the-business-rules-space-at-least/</link>
	<description>Delivering competitive advantage with smarter systems through automating decisions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: First Look - ILOG and Relativity for legacy modernization &#187; Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog</title>
		<link>http://smartenoughsystems.com/wp/2008/02/20/cobol-lives-in-the-business-rules-space-at-least/#comment-10595</link>
		<dc:creator>First Look - ILOG and Relativity for legacy modernization &#187; Smart (Enough) Systems, the blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartenoughsystems.com/wp/2008/02/20/cobol-lives-in-the-business-rules-space-at-least/#comment-10595</guid>
		<description>[...] The initial integration with ILOG&#8217;s product takes this vocabulary across as well as copybooks etc. This would allow new rules to be authored using the same object model and vocabulary as that established in the model in Relativity. At present the candidate rules remain in the Relativity environment and are not moved into the ILOG repository but these candidate rules and some elements of ruleflow are next on the integration roadmap (though no date has been announced yet). In addition Relativity is working on decision tables and decision trees and the companies expect this to help with integration as many trees and tables should come across more or less wholesale. The current integration is with JRule and takes advantage of some of the features in Rules for COBOL (which I blogged about before). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The initial integration with ILOG&#8217;s product takes this vocabulary across as well as copybooks etc. This would allow new rules to be authored using the same object model and vocabulary as that established in the model in Relativity. At present the candidate rules remain in the Relativity environment and are not moved into the ILOG repository but these candidate rules and some elements of ruleflow are next on the integration roadmap (though no date has been announced yet). In addition Relativity is working on decision tables and decision trees and the companies expect this to help with integration as many trees and tables should come across more or less wholesale. The current integration is with JRule and takes advantage of some of the features in Rules for COBOL (which I blogged about before). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COBOL živi! &#124; Dan u životu kompanije</title>
		<link>http://smartenoughsystems.com/wp/2008/02/20/cobol-lives-in-the-business-rules-space-at-least/#comment-7808</link>
		<dc:creator>COBOL živi! &#124; Dan u životu kompanije</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 05:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartenoughsystems.com/wp/2008/02/20/cobol-lives-in-the-business-rules-space-at-least/#comment-7808</guid>
		<description>[...] COBOL živi!!! Bar u upravljanju poslovnim procesima :). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] COBOL živi!!! Bar u upravljanju poslovnim procesima :). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Haley</title>
		<link>http://smartenoughsystems.com/wp/2008/02/20/cobol-lives-in-the-business-rules-space-at-least/#comment-7577</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Haley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartenoughsystems.com/wp/2008/02/20/cobol-lives-in-the-business-rules-space-at-least/#comment-7577</guid>
		<description>How do you compare sequential rule execution to the alternatives and why FI/Ilog offer both?

Are there limitations on inference, scalability, and dynamic deployment that should be more widely understood?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you compare sequential rule execution to the alternatives and why FI/Ilog offer both?</p>
<p>Are there limitations on inference, scalability, and dynamic deployment that should be more widely understood?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
